🔗 Share this article

Perhaps some of the most iconic photographs of the 20th century depicts an unclothed girl, her arms extended, her expression twisted in terror, her skin scorched and flaking. She is dashing towards the camera while escaping an airstrike in South Vietnam. To her side, youngsters also run away from the devastated hamlet of Trảng Bàng, against a backdrop of black clouds and the presence of troops.

This Global Influence of an Seminal Image

Shortly after the release in June 1972, this image—originally called "Napalm Girl"—turned into a traditional hit. Witnessed and discussed globally, it is generally hailed for galvanizing global sentiment opposing the US war in Vietnam. An influential critic later observed how this deeply unforgettable image featuring the child Kim Phúc in agony likely was more effective to increase public revulsion against the war compared to lengthy broadcasts of shown violence. A renowned British war photographer who covered the fighting labeled it the most powerful photograph of the so-called “The Television War”. Another experienced photojournalist stated that the image is simply put, among the most significant photographs ever made, particularly from that conflict.

The Decades-Long Credit Followed by a Modern Assertion

For over five decades, the photo was assigned to the work of Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, a young local photographer employed by the Associated Press in Saigon. But a controversial recent investigation released by a popular platform argues which states the well-known photograph—widely regarded to be the apex of photojournalism—was actually taken by a different man present that day during the attack.

As presented in the investigation, "Napalm Girl" was in fact photographed by an independent photographer, who provided his work to the news agency. The allegation, along with the documentary's resulting investigation, began with a former editor Carl Robinson, who alleges that the dominant bureau head instructed him to change the photo's byline from the stringer to the staff photographer, the only AP staff photographer on site that day.

The Investigation for the Truth

The source, now in his 80s, emailed an investigator in 2022, asking for support to locate the unnamed cameraman. He stated how, should he still be alive, he hoped to extend an acknowledgment. The filmmaker reflected on the unsupported stringers he knew—seeing them as the stringers of today, who, like Vietnamese freelancers in that era, are frequently marginalized. Their work is frequently questioned, and they operate amid more challenging conditions. They lack insurance, no retirement plans, minimal assistance, they frequently lack good equipment, making them highly exposed as they capture images in familiar settings.

The filmmaker wondered: Imagine the experience to be the person who made this image, if in fact Nick Út didn’t take it?” From a photographic perspective, he imagined, it must be deeply distressing. As a follower of photojournalism, specifically the highly regarded war photography of the era, it might be earth-shattering, perhaps career-damaging. The revered history of the photograph within Vietnamese-Americans was so strong that the director whose parents emigrated during the war felt unsure to pursue the project. He said, I was unwilling to disrupt the accepted account that Nick had taken the photograph. And I didn’t want to disturb the status quo of a community that always admired this achievement.”

The Inquiry Unfolds

However the two the filmmaker and his collaborator concluded: it was worth asking the question. “If journalists are to hold everybody else accountable,” said one, we must be able to ask difficult questions of ourselves.”

The investigation tracks the investigators while conducting their own investigation, from discussions with witnesses, to call-outs in present-day the city, to reviewing records from additional films recorded at the time. Their search lead to an identity: a freelancer, working for NBC during the attack who also worked as a stringer to international news outlets independently. In the film, a heartfelt Nghệ, currently advanced in age and living in the United States, claims that he sold the photograph to the news organization for $20 and a print, but was haunted by not being acknowledged for years.

The Reaction Followed by Ongoing Investigation

The man comes across throughout the documentary, quiet and reflective, but his story proved explosive among the world of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to